Should i buy power mac g5

Created in partnership with IBM, it was the first bit processor to be put in a personal computer. Clocked up at 2 GHz, it was the fastest bit processor ever shipped, and with a 1 GHz front-side bus and support for up to 8 GB of memory out of the box, it blew away the system built around the G4. The G5 processor was designed was to be put into multi-processor machines, which Apple sold at the upper end of its product range.

In practice, these numbers meant that the Power Mac G5 ran circles around the G4, but Apple took the opportunity to improve more than just CPU performance. This gave users faster access to their files and media, making all of OS X feel smoother. The new case would be dubbed the "Cheese Grater" due to the large number of holes in the front and back. Those openings were key to keeping air moving through the case.

PowerMac G5 First Look - The best $20 I've ever spent

The cooling system was far more complex than a bunch of little holes, though. The Power Mac G5 was home to nine fans. It turns out, the opposite is true. By putting the fans right precisely where they're needed and independently controlling them all, we can make it a lot quieter. The enclosure was divided into four separate thermal zones, and those fans did their job. The case was made entirely out of aluminum, immediately making the G4s look small and outdated.

Apple retained the handles at the top and bottom of the case, but they were noticeably less comfortable to use than the curved plastic ones on the G4. Like the Power Macs from the previous several years, the side of the G5 opened to reveal its internal components. The side didn't swing down like before, but simply lifted off the case when unlocked.

It was paired with a clear plastic air router that also lifted out of place with minimal effort, granting a user access to their machine's internals. In June , Apple gave the G5 a speed bump, with a dual 2. As clever as Apple's computer-controlled fan system was, it was no match for this machine, and Apple rolled out its first liquid-cooled Mac. Even now, 14 years later, this still blows my mind. Apple did all it could to hide the intricacies of the radiator and hose system behind nicely-designed metal panels:. Note that not all G5s were liquid cooled after it was introduced.

Apple only used this technology when it was needed, and only three SKUs came with a radiator:. Unfortunately, the first two liquid-cooled models were prone to leaks, which could lead to power supply, CPU and motherboard damage. Apple never issued a specific repair bulletin about these issues, but by the time I was a Mac Genius in or so, leaky G5s were taken very seriously. Bringing them into the repair system included a lengthy safety interview with the owner, and repairs were more or less always just "taken care of," regardless of warranty status.

That antifreeze-colored hiccup aside, the PowerMac G5 saw modest improvements during its lifetime, but the last one is worth mentioning. This was a beast of a machine, and was noticeably faster at multi-threaded tasks than its siblings. Some of the parts have been periodically upgraded where appropriate, so calling it the same PC is perhaps a bit of a Ship of Theseus dilemma, but there are certainly components in there which haven't changed at all e. It shouldn't be underestimated how much of a saving that gives. I probably still haven't spent nearly the price of a G5 on it, and I have a PC which is basically on the VR-capable performance line.

Bu basically, just don't buy the cheapest components and you should be fine. They had great error-reporting features. If your kernel crashed, you'd know it if you were anywhere within yards of it because the software-controlled fans would spin up to full blast. I just checked and if you include the Power Usage of the Apple Cinema Display, my machine idles at just over W It's a pity, because it runs quite well - always has.

I have I have been trying to sell it, but obviously nobody wants it. On the other hand, i still have Ableton Live 7 and Logic installed with all my plugins, GB's of Samples and loops on it and I am having a hard time letting go the ability to open my old tracks I know I will never need to, but I think I'll always keep it for that reason. You can still make a nice PC Case with it - I turned mine into a hackintosh and it's just beautiful. Or a fine case for a hackintosh. As an owner of a intel version of that case, its remarkable how heavy and durable it is.

I used a G5 as the base for my first custom case [0].

  • the best photo editing apps for mac?
  • Welcome Image and Text;
  • PowerMac G5 2.7 GHz should i buy it?!
  • french accents on mac os x?
  • Apple PowerMac PowerPC G5 Desktops for sale | eBay;

It was a royal pain to work with, because Apple flipped and recessed their motherboards. Isn't it more like they used that BTX standard or something like that? So I can see if anything is on fire. Also to remove that pesky Apple logo. I use the panel I cut out as a cooling pad for my macbook. That thing can put out some heat. JeremyHerrman on Nov 28, I loved that machine and couldn't believe how snappy OS X was on it.

The way I tested UI speed then was clicking on a menu item say the File menu , and moving my mouse back and forth on the other menu items as fast as I could — the G5 was the first computer I had that could keep up and show all of the sub menus in a flash without stuttering. I experienced the same thing with iPhones, which had the bizarre feeling now more normal and expected of the content being attached to my finger when I scrolled at any speed, even back when the newly revealed content would just be a blank grid until it had time to paint the real content.

I would bet there are still quite a few G5's to be found in recording studios around the world, not to mention G4's and even a few G3's. Post, did Apple follow up with a suitable replacement for the G5 in that context, i. What was it? The performance of "web browsing" on today's bloated web and other tasks not related to running the above software, which may include older versions, is irrelevant.

Maybe Apple's acquisition of Logic had something to do with what happened? G5, why not, G4 maybe a few, G3, definitely not. For music, just no, for basic recording, it can do the job, barely, but for music editing mixing tracks, applying effects, etc , you need a decent computer. The modern web is an especially poor comparison. A big part of the reason why web works at all on modern computers is due to the intensive optimization efforts put into browsers, efforts that aren't backported to older operating systems or architectures. Chrome V8 will run on OS X So on a modern Macbook you'll get highly-optimized code from the JIT, and on an older G3 you'll get a much slower interpreter.

Native optimized apps that were made contemporaneously, like music studio software, are a different story. If it worked well on a G3 in it would still work well today. So maybe you have a bunch of plugins that you love using that you can't track down new copies of, or you don't want to pay for newer versions, or there's a computer in the corner with Gigasampler.

That's easily doable, even if GMail is a mess. You certainly can fill it with expensive plugins or huge stacks of oscillators, but even on a G3 there's a lot you can do. This piece seems incredibly negative. My first ever Mac was the dual 2. Yes, mine did make a weird chirping noise periodically and I think it did eventually become a bit unreliable, but that was after quite a few years.

I have nothing but fond memories of that machine. I agree. It is very easy to judge it harshly in retrospect. I find the comments about heat output especially strange. Perhaps they are forgetting some of the hotblooded pentium 4s of the day. This was not a serious Anandtech review! It was funny and full of hyperbole.

From our nice position 14 years later it is amazing how much power draw we had to tolerate back then. To me it read like an affectionate piece, not a harsh critique. That case was a beauty. I find it incredible how indifferent and uneducated I was back then, about how much power it uses and what the consequences are on a larger scale. Nowadays I am hyper aware of the power consumption of pretty much every device in the house.

I still have a G5 for some specific software, and it has amazing power management. Nothing at the time even came close. It would put itself to sleep without fuss, and wake instantly and seamlessly. It certainly used less power than my newer linux x64 box over the course of a day. I dunno, we had one of these at home for a while, as my wife worked at Apple and it was in the demo pool and we got to borrow it for a bit. It was my primary workstation for a while, and I was a big fan of anything not-x86 and a cheerleader for PowerPC at the time and this was the machine that made me realize what a dead end that architecture had become.

I was sad when Apple went x86 but not in the least bit surprised, given my experience with that workstation. Like others have mentioned here, its heat output was insane. I had to have the house air conditioner on on cool days because of that one room. In the winter, it was the warmest room in the house. It didn't even feel all that powerful to me, as I compared it to a newly build x86 system I had put together at the time. Luckily Apple read the writing on the wall and corrected course accordingly. I did wonder at the time whether gaining a few months was worth saddling software with i slices for several years system frameworks had to be built for 4 different architectures, for instance.

It's true that full 64 bit software support took a bit longer to emerge, but that may have been due to the need to support the 32 bit Intel Macs that were shipped. The main cause of the Apple III's thermal issues was Job's instance that computers should be quiet with no fan and no vents. And even then, those requirements should have been possible to meet, if only the Apple III hadn't been rushed to market without enough time for engineers to diagnose and fix these issues. There hasn't been much 64 bit PPC shipped at that point, so not sure many things shipped all 4.

But it was weird. I've got a first-gen Intel Mac Pro.

My first real computer splurge, August right when they came out. The computer and the Dell WFP still work great to this day. I did, however, buy a new 5k iMac last March because the Mac Pro was simply getting too slow to edit the 20MP photos coming out of my pocket camera. Loved my G5. A huge beast of a machine but a lovely design nonetheless. Would be great to revisit the beautiful case and build something more modern in it sometime. I am still happily using a stock ish Xeon-based 'cheesegrater' tower at home, but if you wanted to just reuse an old PPC or Intel Mac Pro case to build a new system in, there are some ATX adapter kits available[1].

It felt like a brand new computer. It was an "Early " model and I finally replaced it in I remember very clearly going into the original Geek Squad offices on Washington Ave and seeing a bunch of these lining the desks of the agents. I was in complete awe. I asked the guy what they were I knew they were Apple hardware, but had never seen them before.

He just quipped, "New Apple G5's, they're insanely fast and never go down. We love em'. Contrary to what many will tell you this machine was not water-cooled: that was the previous generation of G5s, which had multiple single-core processor chips clocked at higher frequency. This machine is air-cooled and varies between sounding like a thundering highway tuck and a jetliner on takeoff.

It was by far the most performant-compared-to-prevailing-average machine I have ever owned back at a time when such comparisons mattered. I still use the Mac Pro similar specs as mentioned - no trashcan as a workstation today.

Power Mac G5 benchmark controversy -

Nothing too heavy, but it works for the basics. Crazy that a desktop from over 7 years ago can still upgrade to the same RAM as today's best 'pro' MacBook 16gig. But You probably mean I run one of these at home as a server NAS, Minecraft to this day. Runs FreeBSD I was going to email the author about it but couldn't find her email address anywhere - plenty of account details on the usual walled gardens, but no actual email address. Sadly this is becoming more common :. I have a dual core 2. I couldn't find much in the way of installing anything on it I'd honestly looked at Ubuntu and Debian.

Maybe I'll give it another shot. Then leave it to the tinkerers to put together their own Most that would want a more powerful desktop mac would be perfectly fine putting their own together. Then just do a motherboard refresh each year with whatever the current chipset is. Don't even try to be everything to everyone, and leave it to "developer" macs. Just imho. You just described the "xMac", the code-name that all the fans and nerds used for the computer they wished for during the 'aughts.

And I think there's some possibility that a computer like this is on the horizon. Apple wouldn't announce a feature like first-class external GPU support unless they had really big plans for it.

WWDC Provided Some Interesting Updates on Our Favorite Products

Maybe the new Mac Pro they promised will be more like what you're envisioning Apple managed to get lots of "faster than Pentium" ads out of those CPUs. Also m68k IIci was really durable and upgradeable computer. The recent ones run even Windows I remember seeing the first texture-mapped 3D demo ever on it. I was in awe. Those things screamed. My favorite Apple computer was my G4 Quicksilver where the side folded out. I used to own one -- it was a fantastically designed machine, but holy cow was it a good space heater. I had a south-facing second story bedroom and during the summer, using my PowerMac, man, it was toasty in there.

I purchased a G5 tower for cheap, on a whim, from my local university surplus store.

Power Mac G5 Repair

There was a strange sign that said "may leak". I was really confused as to why they were talking about memory leaks W. Only once I got home and opened up the case did I realize that they meant leaking of the liquid cooling system I have yet to repair the cooling and boot up the system. Much less hassle but also much slower.

LLVM builds take ages. I still use my 15 year old Dual Best investment ever, especially with the 30" Cinema display. I still use my quad G5 with Mathematica. Electricity here, at least is so cheap it is largely irrelevant as a proportional variable cost. Or at the very least, I have never thought of it in those terms.

King-Aaron on Nov 28, I bought my G5 tower at the end of the PPC generation, and loved the thing. I think it was or , and I ran the machine until only a couple of years ago. During it's working life, it never skipped a beat, and for a long time was still just as performant as anything being released new. Then came the stage where I could no longer update OSX, couldn't really run the internet as no new browser versions were released The machine was pretty much a brick.

The Power Mac G5 is one of Apple's best designs

But it was a goddamn pretty brick. It's so much better than the newer versions of dumbed-down iTunes. I'm seriously considering rewriting my own version of iTunes 10 as a web app before jumping platforms to Linux about 5 years from now. Ive promised me that more fans would mean less noise due to the "thermal zones" described in the above video, but, at least to my knowledge, that didn't pan out.

It also had a habit of just blasting the fans in the middle of the night like an airplane if I remember correctly. Hmm…doesn't the trial version run as bit? I don't think this would be an accurate representation. You can see that in the ecosystem as well, ppcel builds exist from Ubuntu, but I don't think their performance is as well tuned as the x86 ones.

This is another takeaway, if you don't have hardware in the consumer market, your ecosystem will die out. Nobody will know you. Decade on Nov 28, MacOS X feels nice once you get above version Linux on PPC always felt sluggish. It felt sluggish back when Power Macs were contemporary. The graphics implementation was always inferior, just a basic framebuffer, which could never compare to the hand tuned assembler speed of Aqua.

That made everything feel slower, but Linux was as fast for everything else. No, even starting text-processing commands in the terminal was oddly slow. Once the programs were running, they seemed fine. I remember buying with cash from summer jobs before heading to college in — I named it Jupiter. The thing was a beast and I loved it. Two years later, I bought it a companion, the first Macbook Pro — named Mars. These were all great products, and they inspired me to start the Mac Users Group at my university :. I was just thinking about how I bought a G5 Thanksgiving weekend back in I bought the base configuration.

My wimpy 12" Powerbook felt faster, because it wasn't thrashing all over the place like the G5 was. I think I lasted three days before upgrading the memory. Reason on Nov 28, I had one of these wind tunnels for a while in the s. A dual 1. It looked ultra-cool, beautifully designed inside and out.

But it ran really loud even by the standards back then There was actually a high end water-cooled model that was notorious for developing leaks - doubt there's many of those remaining in service these days! I never got round to get rid of my watercooled dual G5, as I was hoping way to long to find some neat use case for it.

Mostly because it's probably the most performant non-Intel computer readily available i. Anyone has a better use case to either inspire me or get mine donated for the cost of shipping from Gernay? You can use the excellent case as a PC case, you can buy kits that allow you to fit a standard ATX motherboard in it. You can propose it on channels like gentoo-powerpc on freenode for example. After a brief diversion with the Pentium D Intel essentially gave up on the Pentium 4 in favour of a multi-core development of the Pentium M, which was sold as the Core architecture.

I have a personal story: the application I worked on at that time needed some complicated calculations and decisions during them -- and to complete every run took a significant time, measured in minutes, or even hours, and there was a lot to calculate. But once somebody ran the application on a Pentium M notebook, nobody could believe at first: on the notebook it run faster than on the Pentiums 4 desktops in the office, even if the notebook had lower clock than the Pentiums 4 desktops!

The reasons are many, if I remember what I've understood then correctly, the Pentium 4 design was never meant to target at least not much the clock speeds at which it was eventually sold. Apparently there were marketing people in Intel who influenced the development of the new processors, who managed to press the engineers to target always "more GHz" -- that was simple and easiest to sell, having more GHz than competition.

So apparently the Pentium 4 design was made to conceptually enable up to 10 GHz clock speeds! Today it sounds science fiction, but before that time the clock speed did rise a lot for quite a years nicely. Also apparently, some engineers warned the marketing that maybe it's not going to be easy to reach 10 GHz. There are some specific dependencies that simply don't go linearly. So in practice Pentiums 4 have been sold with the lower clock that they were designed for, most of the customers didn't notice much.

So what were the Pentium M advantages? That was a processor developed by another team not even in the USA but in Israel , and with the specific goal of doing more in less clock counts.

Shop by category

It worked marvelously for the real life demands, like the calculations present in our application. Compared to the Pentium 4, the M also had more CPU cache, obviously enough for our application to shine. For our application Pentium M was not "within a few percent" it was really much better than Pentium 4.

  • Power Mac G5 Repair - iFixit.
  • mov editor mac os x.
  • mac the ripper os x 10.9.
  • split mkv file half mac.
  • mac os available disk space.
  • The Mighty Power Mac G5;

The P4 NetBurst architecture used very deep pipelines, which allowed it to be clocked very fast. To fill that pipeline the scheduler had to predict a lot of branches. So if your code had an unrolled loop then it performed well. However, if the scheduler mispredicted branches then the time to flush all those wrong branches and refill the pipeline caused severe inefficiencies.

You are here

The 'speed demon' design also suffered from power dissipation problems, excess leakage current at high frequencies. The Core architecture did away with the super deep pipelines, and it sounds like that avoided a particularly pathological case in your application. Core came out in The G5 and the G4 were from another time. Back in the early 's and late 90's it wasn't uncommon two have two machines at your desk. One for internet and email, the other for Microsoft Office. With OS X you could combine them both into one machine. WTF are you talking about? You think people had 2 machines to run Office and Internet?

I don't know if this is a joke or just a delusion.